SA-AIRS™ is a weighted, multi-dimension audit methodology designed to model AI career displacement risk with full explainability. Not a quiz. Not an opinion. A structured audit calibrated against real cohort data.
The assessment evaluates five independent dimensions of your role. Each dimension targets a distinct driver of AI displacement. The composite score is a weighted combination of these five dimensions, where higher scores indicate greater displacement risk.
How predictable and rule-based your core daily work is. Highly patterned work — even complex-looking work — is the primary target for automation.
Not theoretical AI capability — whether tools available today can replicate your actual deliverables. Scored by auditing real role outputs.
The supply side of displacement. When AI enables consolidation, which roles and markets feel it first is determined partly by supply-demand dynamics.
Work requiring multi-variable judgment, ethical trade-offs, or real-time contextual decisions is substantially harder to replicate at scale. We measure actual decision latitude.
Work embedded in personal trust, political context, or relationship capital resists automation by design. We measure how deeply your role depends on being human.
// Exact dimension weights, scoring rubrics, and calibration data are proprietary. Full methodology is shared with clients who complete a Full Report or Deep Dive engagement.
The composite score (0–10) maps to one of five risk tiers. Each tier comes with specific action guidance — not generic advice.
Most AI risk frameworks are either too simplistic (a 5-question quiz) or too theoretical (white-paper models detached from real roles). SA-AIRS™ was designed to close that gap.
Every score is produced by a documented methodology — not a gut feeling or a trend article. The same role, assessed twice with the same inputs, produces the same score.
The dimensions we measure are chosen because they directly correlate with observed job displacement patterns across mid-market and enterprise roles. We do not measure proxies — we measure drivers.
The scoring rubric has been calibrated across cohorts of working professionals across engineering, finance, marketing, and operations. The score bands map to observed outcomes — not theoretical risk models.
You receive a score, a tier, and a breakdown by dimension. Nothing is a black box. If you want to understand why you scored where you did, the reasoning is always provided.
Displacement risk is not a binary event. The Full Report gives you both a 12-month and 36-month horizon — because the right action differs depending on how much runway you have.
More data means higher scoring confidence. The Risk Score is a directional read. The Full Report is a high-confidence audit with all five dimensions fully scored.
Choose the assessment depth that fits you, then get your score, risk tier, and next steps.
Get Your Score →